Roll wheel faster despotism 3k1/1/2023 You wrote: "But when he applies his 'matter of fact' style to the hazier areas of poker and life, he loses credibility." It MIGHT make for smoother and easier reading, SOMETIMES. MAYBE I can understand how SOME people PROBABLY find that style of writing SOMEWHAT appealing. He avoids words like 'maybe' and 'probably' that muddle the works of many." You wrote: "One thing I like about David's poker-theory writing is that he is forceful and clear. I think you will find that most of the debates on this forum are disagreements over opinion rather than disagreements over facts. You wrote: "My point to you is NOT that David was 'wrong.' He simply stated his opinion." I don't remember seeing such a discussion, but I also don't read every post in every thread on every 2+2 forum. You wrote: "I presume you folks already hashed over that topic when it happened. Posted on: Friday, 2 February 2001, at 9:50 p.m. But when he applies his "matter of fact" style to the hazier areas of poker and life, he loses credibility. He avoids words like "maybe" and "probably" that muddle the works of many. One thing I like about David's poker-theory writing is that he is forceful and clear. Roll wheel faster despotism 3k professional#He's a professional poker writer, just like me, and he can weild the pen as he pleases. Or that he shouldn't write about things other than aces and kings. My point to you is NOT that David was "wrong." He simply stated his opinion. I presume you folks already hashed over that topic when it happened. Further, I was disappointed and embarrassed that one of our premier ambassadors had such thoughts and felt compelled to share them. David wrote about dealers and "intelligence." His presumptions about the goals and motives and abilities of individuals are, in my opinion, absurd. (I'm lazy.) Otherwise, I would grab a few back issues from the pile in the corner, reread some of David's articles, and find an example for you. I do not share your zeal for research and citing. I've read every word he ever published in Poker Digest, and occasionally he would make statements of fact that I felt were opinion. I don't have a laundry list of disagreements that I can simply rattle off. Posted by: Tommy Angelo on: Friday, 2 February 2001, at 1:44 p.m. HPFAP no longer works?" 22 February 2000 in J10Suited's 22 February 2000 post entitled "Posted on r.g.p. Or are your disagreements with David so minor that a discussion of them would not help improve anyone's poker game? And isn't that one of the purposes of this forum? I might learn something new and improve my poker game. I, too, would be interested in reading about your disagreements with David-even your disagreements over the no-so-major things. Mason once wrote: "Sometimes, we can learn more from our adversaries than we can learn from our friends who don't necessarily questions our ideas as much as they should." You wrote: "That's where David and I agree, on the major things."
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |